
Role UX Designer
Partners Client · Digital Strategist · Front & Back-end Engineering
Deliverables User Stories · Wireframes · High-fidelity
Tools Axure RP · Sketch · Photoshop · InVision · UsableNet
Timeframe 6 months
Company GeekHive
Tauck's digital experience was failing at the most critical moment: conversion. Despite a century of delivering world-class travel, the website couldn't match it. Unintuitive search, buried filtering, and product pages that obscured rather than inspired left users disengaged and bookings on the table.
The challenge was clear: redesign the core discovery and consideration journey to match the quality of the Tauck experience itself, while positioning the brand to capture a new generation of affluent travelers.
Product pages didn't answer the right questions
Travelers couldn't confidently evaluate trip offerings because itinerary navigation was cumbersome and didn't align with how users made booking decisions.
Filtering required too much work
All search filters were buried in a fly-out menu with no ability to combine selections, preventing users from narrowing down relevant results.
Search worked against users
Disruptive animations, a lack of parameters, and a truncated autocomplete made users think no trips were available or returned too many options — causing friction in trip discovery.
Reduce operational costs
Encourage users to self-serve by providing clear steps and resources for managing trip bookings, reducing their need to call support.
Sustained growth
Boost long-term revenue by increasing repeat purchases, with a focus on younger generations for sustained growth.
Improve conversion rates
Improve retention and satisfaction by eliminating search dead ends and guiding users toward relevant products based on their motivators.
I started by reviewing third-party customer research to learn about Tauck's audience. Then I led stakeholder interviews to close gaps. Two user segments emerged: a loyal, older, less digitally fluent group and a younger, high-net-worth cohort expecting a seamless digital experience. Both segments had strategic value and needed design solutions to serve them without alienating either.
I led a competitive analysis, benchmarking leading hotels and travel brands on search and discovery. I cross-referenced findings with stakeholder pain points for sharper focus. The research was translated into user stories to align the team with a prioritized, defensible scope.

I developed wireframe concepts for search and product page considerations. Each showed critical interaction decisions, helping stakeholders and engineers understand user movement. Presenting multiple approaches encouraged informed decisions and accelerated alignment.
This phase served as a pressure test of the design strategy, allowing the team to discuss ambiguities and identify technical constraints before high-fidelity work began.











I redesigned the search and booking experience to reducefriction, improve relevance, and give users more control over trip discovery. These changes contributed to a 19% increase in luxury travel bookings and a 42% increase in filter usage, demonstrating stronger engagement with key planning tools.
The launch also increased client confidence by delivering amore intuitive and effective search experience. This work reinforced the value of grounding design decisions in user validation, accessibility, and realistic planning for cross-device experiences.
↑42%
Increase in search filter usage after giving users greater control as indicated by analytics.
↓200
Reduction of monthly "no results found" dead-end searches as indicated by analytics.
↑19%
Increase in average annual luxury travel bookings from repeat customers.
Plan for mobile users
Doubling mobile design time estimates would have created space for deeper exploration and refinement, improving usability across devices.
UX artifacts enable better outcomes
Skipping foundational UX work in favor of polished visuals limits the ability to uncover technical and usability challenges.
User validation is critical
User research and testing earlier would have strengthened confidence that solutions were truly human-centered, not just stakeholder-approved.